Harish Chand And ANR. v. Xen, Dhbvnl Sohna And ORS.

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 378 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025 Harish Chand and Another ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

XEN, DHBVNL and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Kamal Saini and Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr. Lajpat Rai Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The learned counsel representing the parties are ad idem that against the order granting temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner, the first appeal filed by the defendants is pending before the First Appellate Court. They jointly pray for disposal of the revision petition with request to the First Appellate Court to decide the pending appeal within a specified time.

2.

Keeping in view the limited prayer made in the revision petition, the First Appellate Court is directed to dispose of the pending miscellaneous appeal within a period of next two months uninfluenced with the observations made in the impugned order.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.13 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Civil Revision No. 378 of 2024 (O&M) 3.

With the observations made above, this revision petition is disposed of. The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 12, 2025 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.13 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document