Manpreet Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

INCOMP-6050-2024 Date of decision: 27.11.2024 MANPREET KAUR AND ANR ...PeƟƟoners

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

None for the peƟƟoners.

Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA , J.(ORAL) 1.

The aforesaid peƟƟon was filed on 25.01.2021 by Sh. Vinod K. Kaushal, Advocate. The Registry had raised objecƟon on the case file on 27.01.2021. 2.

State counsel submits that statement of parƟes have been recorded and they are living happily.

3.

As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the peƟƟon on which objecƟons have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. The same was not taken back for re-filing aŌer removal of objecƟons. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Note was published by the Registry in the cause list, whereby the advocates were requested to collect their all cases lying with objecƟons for re-filing aŌer removal of objecƟons. 4.

It was further noƟfied that all pending cases of this type will be listed in Court for appropriate order. The case was shown in the cause list. No one was present on behalf of the peƟƟoner on the last date, nor today. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed and the same is disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE November 27, 2024 Nisha Yadav Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No NISHA 2024.11.28 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.