Urmila v. Mahabir And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4996 of 2015 Date of Decision.07.08.2015 Smt. Urmila Devi .......Petitioner

Versus

Mahabir and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate for Mr. Devender Arya, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

It is not possible to entertain a revision petition against an order passed by the MACT where the permission is sought for withdrawal of certain amounts standing in the name of minor children. There is already an appeal pending against the award passed by the Tribunal and the petitioner may approach the High Court in the said appeal for any direction for withdrawal of the amount setting out any justification for premature withdrawal of the amount ordered to be deposited in the name of minor children and directed to be held in the name of the minors during the period of minority.

2.

With this liberty, the revision petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 07, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.08.10 12:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document