Ranjit Singh v. Meena And ORS

C.R. No. 4619 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4619 of 2017 Date of decision:- 18.07.2017 Ranjit Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

Meena and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner.

RITU BAHRI J. (Oral) This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of CPC is for setting aside order dated 29.04.2017 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Addl. Civl Judge (Jr. Divn.) Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, whereby the application of respondent No. 1/plaintiff dated 17.09.2016 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for correction of word Assanda by Assauda, in the address given in the bottom of the plaint and in the affidavit, has been allowed. A bare perusal of impugned order shows that the plaintiff had already given her address of the village even in her petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C as well as in an application under 156(3) Cr.P.C wherein her address had been mentioned to village Assauda only. GAURAV ARORA 2017.08.08 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

C.R. No. 4619 of 2017 -2Thus, the application of the plaintiff had rightly been allowed. In view of the above discussion, the revision petition is dismissed being devoid of merits July 18, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2017.08.08 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh