Dhanwant Singh v. Gurmit Singh And ORS

C.R. No.5005 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5005 of 2016 Date of Decision.08.08.2016 Dhanwant Singh .......Petitioner Vs.

Gurmit Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. D.S. Gurna, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved of the order dated 13.07.2016, whereby, evidence of the petitioner is closed. Mr. D.S. Gurna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in case, one opportunity is granted, he will conclude the entire evidence.

I have heard the counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff and appraised the paper book and of the view that no doubt, the petitionerplaintiff was negligent in concluding the evidence. However, in order to advance justice and prevent miscarriage of justice, I deem it appropriate to grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner to conclude the evidence. Keeping in view the aforementioned observations, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner-plaintiff shall conclude the evidence in accordance with law subject to payment of costs of `5,000/- which shall be condition precedent. If the costs is not paid as directed, the order passed PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.10 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R. No.5005 of 2016 -2already by the court below shall stand restored. The impugned order is set aside and the revision petition is allowed.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 08, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.10 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document