Parminder Kumar v. Malkiat Singh Dhaliwal

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5029 of 2016 Date of Decision.02.09.2016 Parminder Kumar .......Petitioner Vs.

Malkiat Singh Dhaliwal ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The revision petition is filed at the instance of petitionerplaintiff asking the Court to adopt the procedure under Order 37 CPC in the suit at the stage when the defendant has led the evidence. It is too late in a day whereas the plaintiff acquiesced with the trial of the suit in ordinary manner as the notice in the suit were issued in ordinary manner and party has put in appearance and treated the case as ordinary suit. I do not find any illegality and perversity in the order passed by the Court below, much less, the order cannot be said to be passed without jurisdiction. No ground for interference is made out. The revision petition is dismissed.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 02, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.09.07 13:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document