Arshdeep Singh And ANR v. Amarjit Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.505 of 2016 Date of Decision.27.01.2016 Arshdeep Singh and another .......Petitioners Vs.

Amarjit Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Ms. Harmanpreet Kaur (Simmi), Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is simply no justification for a plaintiff to come with an application for amendment of a plaint challenging decree of the year 1970 when his grandfather has brought about a change of rights subsequently through a family arrangement or partition that is said to have taken place in the year 1974. When there has been equal distributation made, his own act of not making a provision for one of the sons namely the plaintiff's father cannot give any ground for bringing a challenge to the 1970 decree. The plaintiff will be bound what the father did and he cannot get over a transaction of the year 1970 especially when all the four sons of Bakhtaur have brought about themselves an arrangement with an equal distribution of all the family properties de hors the 1970 decree. The application was unnecessary and the Court below has dismissed it. 2.

I will find no reason for interfering with the order passed by the Court below. The revision petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 27, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.01.28 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document