High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/5050/2016dismissed

Sony Tailor v. Pankaj Bhatia

2016-09-14Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CR-5050-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.5050 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 14, 2016.

Sony Tailor ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

Pankaj Bhatia ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for caveator-respondent.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner under the instructions from the revision petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with prayer that petitioner be allowed reasonable time for vacating and handing over the possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord. Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent and agrees with the proposal as put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner to the extent that the respondent has no objection in allowing time of eleven months to the revision petitioner to vacate the demised premises. In view of request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, Sachin Mehta 2016.09.17 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CR-5050-2016 -2this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The revision petitioner is allowed period upto 13.08.2017 to vacate the demised premises, subject to the following terms:- (i) The petitioner-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto 30th September, 2016 within two weeks. (ii) He will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne profits of subsequent months upto 13.08.2017 on or before 7th day of each month.

(iii) He will file affidavit before the Executing Court within three weeks giving details of entire payment of rent/mesne profits and undertaking to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord on or before 13.08.2017. In case of default of any of the above terms, the respondentlandlord will be entitled to execute the order of ejectment forthwith. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 14, 2016.

JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2016.09.17 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH