Leela Dhar v. Bhagwati

C.R. No.5059 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5059 of 2016 Date of Decision.09.08.2016 Leel Dhar son of Shri Bhikhi Mal .......Petitioner Vs.

Bhagwati wife of Shri Ram Singh ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL *********** AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The revision petition is against the order dated 21.06.2016 vide which the lower Appellate Court has, while admitting the misc. appeal filed against ad interim order dated 27.05.2016 granting injunction, stayed the operation of the order.

Mr. Shiv Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it tantamounts to allowing the appeal and in the garb of the order, the respondent-defendant is threatening to dispossess the petitioner-plaintiff. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and appraised the paper book and of the view that the petitioner ought to avail the remedy of seeking vacation of the stay before the lower Appellate Court. Let this exercise be done within a period of one week from today and thereafter, the lower Appellate Court shall decide the appeal within one month and also consider the objections viz-a-viz staying operation of the interim order. In view of the observations made by this Court, the revision PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.17 18:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

C.R. No.5059 of 2016 -2petition is disposed of with the above directions, dispensing with notice to the respondent.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 09, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.17 18:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document