Saroj Kalia v. Manohar Lal And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No. 108 Case No. : C. R. No. 47 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 29, 2019 Saroj Kalia ....

Petitioner vs.

Manohar Lal and another ....

Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.

* * * Present :

Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner.

* * * DEEPAK SIBAL , J.

(Oral) :

In view of the liberty granted by the Trial Court that in case, respondent no. 2 - Satish Kumar's suit is decreed, the petitioner would have a right to file objections to its execution, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, at this stage. In view of the above statement, the present petition is disposed of by acknowledging the right of the petitioner to file objections, if at all respondent no.2 - Satish Kumar's suit for possession is decreed, during its execution to be filed by Satish Kumar.

( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE January 29, 2019 monika Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

MONIKA 2019.01.30 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh