Rashmi Balyan v. Naveen Dahiya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 TA-69-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2025 RASHMI BALYAN ....Applicant

Versus

NAVEEN DAHIYA ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the respondent. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (ORAL) CM-11015-CII-2025 The present application has been filed at the behest of the respondent, thereby seeking to place on record the document, Annexure R-6, with regard to the working status of the applicant. In view of the averments made in the application, same is allowed and the requisite document is taken on record as Annexure R-6. Main case At this stage, the counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the transfer application and the same be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Ordered accordingly.

(ARCHANA PURI) 16.07.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.07.17 09:37 I agree to specified portions of this document P&HHC