Saroj Jain And Others v. State Bank Of India Th. Its Authorised Representative

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1506 of 2022 Date of Decision: 07.03.2022 Saroj Jain and others ..... Petitioners versus State Bank of India ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present :

Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Lakshit Gupta, Advocate for the respondent-Bank.

M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO J. (ORAL) Heard learned counsels for the parties.

It is stated that an OTS proposal has been sanctioned in favour of the writ petitioners by the respondent-Bank, and on account of the same, the present writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE 07.03.2022



  
   RITTU 2022.03.08 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document