Jagjit Singh Etc v. Charanjit Kaur And ANR
! "#$%#
&
'
&
* $+ !,
* ,$ & %# !,
-
)
, .
/
# 0) #
. 1,
&3,
&34)
"
# 1"
4!
+ !5
62 #
0
.1,
&3 .45
62 #
0
3
0
"
!5 0
5
₹
!
!!83
) .
5
/
0 " 5 (
)) / #
)) !
5
,
&3 ,
&39 /
0 ) 0
:
,
&35 ; )
"
5
#
/
0
1,
&394!5
0 0)
# ))
!
% 9
/%
,!<
5
"
0) )
#
#
2 8 /
0 !
!
0
5
)
.1,
&3,
&34
#
!
!
0
)
%
9
)
0 $ #
!5
5 5
0# 0
2 8
)
/
0
5 0
;
5
$ #0
/
0
5 5
)
!5
# #
#8
0
62& /
#
)) # #0
0
,))
0
0 ) )
# !
5
#
0
! 5 0
#
/
0 $ #0
#
62 #
!0
!5 0
5
0
)
/
0 0) #
# )
)
0
9 -
#
)
))
: ) 0) #
5 5
)
0
"
% 9# ₹ "# %#
!!83 )
) ./
5
#0 /
<!
"
3
!5
#
"
;
! )
# -
5
#
"
)
# -
5
0
62 #
5
)
.-
,
&3&3
0
,)
.1,
&345
5 5 #
!
5
0
5 5 0 5 5
"
;
=
!5
)
; !5 $ #0
,))
!
; 5
#
5
#
)
=
!5
5
5 ;
$ #0 5
#
"
!5
6
5
5
5 0
!5 #
8)
. %
)) 1,
&394!
)
.1,
&345
)
0 )
0 5
5 5
5
#
;
$ (
!
5
:
5
#
"
/5
5
; 5 5 & $ ,
.1,
&3.4 5
#
)
5
$ #0
/
)
0 $ % 9! 5
8) ) 5
#
"
5
8
0
$ #0
5
0 ; 5 5
"
3
/
!
!
#
; =
!5
"
5
;
5 )
0
/ 5
) 8)
5
# #
# 8
0
5
,
# $ #0
#5
)
) 0
0 :
* :>,?-
)
#0
5
! " #
$$$$$$$%&'()$'$*+$ ,$-.
-/0 - 1 -/
2$
3 -/0 - 1 -/ 14
4 ( / 4/
1
5$6 11 07 170 - 1 -/ 770
/ -/ 1048/ 4/ 1
)$ .
1 07 170 - 1 -/ 770 . 10931 4/ :/ $ /
&$19.
1 07 170 - 1 -/ 770 ;; 7 10
4/ / -/ < $
- $$$$: (($ 41$ /1 .
1 07 170 - 1 -/ 770 !1. -/ 10/41 4/ ;
$ -11$ $$$ 4(4 $ (1 41 341; 4 . $ ======= :144 > /$$$ / 64 4(1: (($ /$$$ 64 4(1 4(4 $ !
>
!" # " !$
$% "
&%
% '
( ) % %
*+ , - $ !$
$% . &
$% / 0
%
$ *% +%
* "% % " 2 " % 3(4
%
%
7 5
$% % %
!$ 8! 9 * * % & 2 "
6 $ % &
.
!" # " % /75 :
*;
* % *% "% %
% ' 2-% % %
' 5 <
%
7 5
$% % %
!$ 8! 9 * "% %
$ = % )'
% 7 # 1 !$
$% % % 5 >
< !" # %
& % % 8% 7 # 9 %
$
% !" # % 5 >
"%
% >
" ' $ $ !" # >
" % % " $ 5 % & !" # % %
???
??????
???
??????
,$ >%% !" # ' >
< ?
@/ 2$ </4/413 ((/64( 4 3144 /-.
-/ (1 ; -/@:
5$ >%%
%
A
?:
)$ </4/41 (3 (( ; 94@:
&$ </4/41 4(4 4 4 (134 ($ ,* ***0A05&(:@:
B$ >%%
6 ?@// %$ </4/41 3 (( 14 4 4 (1 341; 4
. 31C4 (1@::
+$ 4 4($ ???
??????
???
??????
,'$ B & 5 = % % 5 5 5 % % % >
< )' " ' % !" # +% 5 & 5 $ % & 6 7 '
& +% $ %
???
??????
???
??????
$$$$$$/ % $ $ $ 2- % % & )' / < $" % '''
'''
'''
2%$
/44D4;C(
- 41(14
4
(3 ((( /4149C
;
4
7 / $ 4144/4494314314 ( 494 - 4
/4141 1;$E < / $ #0
,))
$ #0
-
#
5 $ #0
))
$ #0
/
$ #0
#
@
#
"
!5 5
#
# /
5#
)
8
0
5
!
0
5
<
5
5 #
#
"
; "
2
)
0
!
$ (
5
)
0
/!
% 9 /%
,!
<
)
5 @
3
# "
!
#
!
)
, !
#
"
3
!
0 #
0
!)
"
%0
0# )
8$ #0
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Shalini Shyam Shetty and another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil", reported as (2010) 8 Supreme Court Cases 329, had observed that the High Courts cannot, at the drop of a hat, in exercise of its power of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution, interfere with the orders of tribunals or courts inferior to it. Nor can it, in exercise of this power, act as a court of appeal over the orders of court or tribunal subordinate to it. It was also observed in the said judgment that a statutory amendment with respect to Section 115 of the Civil
Procedure Code does not and cannot cut down the ambit of High Court's power under Article 227 but at the same time, it must be remembered that such statutory amendment does not correspondingly expand the High Court's jurisdiction of superintendence under Article 227. The power of interference under this Article is to be kept to the minimum to ensure that the wheel of justice does not come to a halt and the fountain of justice remains pure and unpolluted in order to maintain public confidence in the functioning of the tribunals and courts subordinate to the High Court. It was also observed that the power under Article 227 may be unfettered but its exercise is subject to high degree of judicial discipline. 11.
Keeping in view the above, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned orders do not call for any interference by this Court while exercising its powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and accordingly, the impugned orders are upheld and the present revision petition being meritless, deserves to be dismissed and is dismissed.
!"#!$ %&'()(*
: 44 ;
:#8
3
8 ;
3
8