Iqbal Singh v. State Of Haryana Through Collector Ambala And ORS.

CR No.5344 of 2016 (O&M) {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5344 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:22.08.2016 Iqbal Singh ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Manohar Lall, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press the grounds of revision petition provided that a direction may be issued to the Lower Appellate Court to decide the application seeking restoration of the appeal as the order under challenge was passed on the application for condonation of delay in filing the application seeking restoration of the appeal, i.e., under Order 41 Rule 19 of Code of Civil Procedure. In this regard, he has drawn the attention of this Court to the various zimni orders extracted in the grounds of revision petition. I am in agreement with the aforementioned submission of Mr. Lall, for the reasons that 52 adjournments have been taken by the other side in not arguing the matter. Since Mr. Lall, has not pressed the revision petition on merits, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the present revision petition with a direction to the Lower Appellate Court to decide the Savita 2016.08.24 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CR No.5344 of 2016 (O&M) {2} application stated to be pending for restoration of the appeal as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one month and main appeal within another period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Accordingly, revision petition stands disposed of. (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 22, 2016 savita Wheather speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2016.08.24 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh