← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/248/2023disposed of

Kuldeep Kumar Singh v. State Of Punjab

2026-04-28Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 238-1 CRR-248-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.04.2026 Kuldeep Kumar Singh

...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

State of Punjab and another

...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Shivender Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Manpreet Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) CRM-3452-2023 Prayer in the present application is for condonation of delay of 79 days in filing the revision petition.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 79 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. CRM-3453-2023 Allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the copies of FIR; application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.; statement; application under Section 319 Cr.P.C.; reply; and order annexed as Annexures P-1 to P-5 are taken on record. The applicant-petitioner is also exempted from filing the certified copies of the same. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place with page marking. Main case The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 04.08.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Moga, whereby the petitioner-Kuldeep Kumar Singh has been summoned as an SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

248 CRR-248-2023 (O&M) additional accused.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly concedes that the trial is at an advanced stage and the case is now fixed for defence evidence on 30.04.2026. There was no interim stay when the notice of motion in the present petition was issued. 3.

Taking note of the developments that have taken place during the interregnum and noticing that the case is already at a fag end, counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition so as to take all pleas before the Trial Court.

4.

The present petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.

5.

Since the present petition already stands disposed of, CRM3454-2023 has been rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of as such 6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 28.04.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.29 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document