Sunil Kumar And Others v. Anurag Rastogi And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.304 of 2026 Date of decision: May 25th, 2026 Sunil Kumar and others .....Petitioners

Versus

Anurag Rastogi and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Dalbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana with Principal Secretary, School Education, Haryana (through V.C.) and respondent No.3 in person. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that against the judgment dated 14.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of which contempt is alleged, the respondents have filed two LPAs as two writ petitions were decided vide judgment dated 14.11.2025. It is submitted that in both the LPAs, Division Bench of this Court was pleased to issue notice of motion and also grant interim order in favour of the respondents herein. It is further submitted that the cost as imposed on the last date has also been paid to the petitioners.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioners to revive/file fresh contempt petition after the decision in the LPA-1267-2026 in case any cause survives.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. May 25th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.05.25 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh