Himmat Singh Pannu v. Union Territory Of Chandigarh And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-1531-2022 (O&M) Date of decision:- 31.01.2022 Himmat Singh Pannu

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Union Territory of Chandigarh through Advisor to the Administrator and Secretary, Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh Administration, Sector 9, Punjab Mini Secretariat, Chandigarh and others.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:

Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Nikita Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anil Mehta, Senior Standing Counsel, with Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 4 - U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Manpreet Singh Longia, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.

(The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual Court) * * * * RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL) Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing at length submits that the representation dated 21.01.2022 (Annexure P-12), moved by him before respondent No. 2 i.e. Director Principal, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32-B, Chandigarh, may be directed to be considered and decided by the authority concerned. Mr. Anil Mehta, learned senior standing counsel, appearing for respondents No.

1 to 4 - Union Territory, Chandigarh, submits that the aforesaid representation shall be considered by the Admission Committee and a decision thereon would be taken in accordance with law after considering the documents filed by the petitioner and communicated to him within three days. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as the statement of learned senior standing counsel for respondents No. 1 to 4, the writ petition stands disposed of. (RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE 31.01.2022 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMODH SHARMA 2022.02.