Satish Kumar And Others v. State Bank Of India

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 1705 of 2019 Date of Decision: 29.1.2019 Satish Kumar and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State Bank of India .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ or directions in the nature of mandamus for quashing the demand notice dated 14.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) and the letter issued by the bank dated 8.1.2019 (Annexure P-3). 2.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to the petitioners either to approach the bank or to avail the alternative remedies as are available to them, in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. However, it shall be open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies as may be, available to them, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE January 29, 2019 Gurpreet Whether speaking/ reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No GURPREET SINGH 2019.01.30 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh