Amar Nath v. Sanatan Kumar
! "# $ " % &
"
' "
)( "
&"
" )% (*%"+#$*
"% ,
"
&"+ " %
" "
"
"* $
-("
&, &, $
. * $
-("
&, &," /
"
(!0 0( -
&"+ " %
* + *+
1%
"% "
* %
.% % *(+
" *!+% * % ,
"#% "
. * + *+ 1%
*
&"+ " %
* + *+
" , 1%
3% "
1 * "% * + % "% 1 %
# 1 "+%*" " !0
*% "!
/.
" ("
*!(% . /
% "!" . " ( *% " , * ""
% !0
#.% %"
( * * + *+ " , 1 %
3%
" * !+ % * % "/ %
"% "
* %
#%
. * + *+ " , 1%
* Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the case for some time, when this Court was not accepting the same on merits, stated that the petitioner-tenant is still in possession of the demised premises and prayed that he may be granted four months' time to vacate the same and to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlord on or before 16.01.2017.
. % !
#% "
*
" 5 . "# "% * !+
"%
"# .% (
( 1 + "
% "
* " +("% "
* + *% -
.% %% "
, * %%
("
* *% "
* #%
*
% . 1 "
.% %% !
*!+%
, 3%
" %
(
( + % * "
( # "
* *%
*+
3% " "" "
"
6
"
# +# %!
*!+%
".%%
"
"# &% / #
"! " # 1.% %#% "
%! ! "+ - ( % "* "
# "%.% 7 3%
" %
( *
% (("
"
6
"
!+ % "+
% .% %
"
"#&% / 4 % 1 * (#% "
, * %! " - ( % "* "
!
# "%.% 8 3%
%* "+% " +6. " %"1
"% " *% .
(*
( +% * * "
3%
% *% "% ( %+
% * * "
#" "
( !"
#
"! " % ( ** % "
, * "*# 1 .% % "
, * %! " - ( % "* "
3%
%("
% ( * "/ 1 % "
* % !
"
# .% %
"
"69- ( 1 ("# &% / #
"
! "
# .% %# % "
, * %! ! "+ - ( %
"* "
! ( %+
+ % ( * "/ 1 #
%
%"
* "% ! ! "
* * 1
. % *
% "
#%
+
,44 # *
"( (
!
"#$#$%&
:% % " / 16"
;
:% % " "!
;