Adrash Shiksha Samiti v. Balkishan & Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-5391-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.03.2022 ADRASH SHIKSHA SAMITI

...Petitioner

V/S BALKISHAN & OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

None for respondents No.16 to 26.

-.- ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
       

        
 



   ! ! "    # $  %

#

 &  '

  '

%      ( & '

   

&  

      

  & &   $ 

  ' '

&           & )      %  *   a mere typographical error at the time of filing the plaint is being held against the petitioner for non-suiting it to seek the correction thereof. While in the amendment application all that has been prayed is that instead 12/135th share as pleaded in the plaint, the same be read as 13/135th share.

+  $ 

    ' '&   

$ , ,#   & -  *    .  

 %  '

    '   & '

   / 

# ultimate entitlement of the plaintiff whether it is 12/135th or 13/135th is a subject matter of trial. It shall be VANDANA 2022.03.03 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

determined only after culmination of trial. Notwithstanding, the application has been wrongly dismissed on the ground that it will change the nature of suit./      

% ,/       

  

&   % 

&  &    

 . #  %#   &    

       

%   '  &    & )  

% &  

%    

7. Disposed of accordingly. Notice to the respondent is dispensed with. (ARUN MONGA) JUDGE March 2, 2022 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No VANDANA 2022.03.03 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document