Shashi Kumar @ Sunil Mehta v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3080-2019 Date of Decision: 21.05.2019 Shashi Kumar @ Sunil Mehta .... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:
Mr.Suresh K.Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate for respondent No.6.
Mr.Johny, Advocate for Mr.Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.7.
**** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 7 is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place. A copy thereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State submits that this petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the investigation has been referred back to the same Police Station at Sonepat. Dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
May 21, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) anju JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU 2019.05.23 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc