Amit Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS
ANKUR GOYAL 2020.03.05 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.242 CWP No.1977 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION: March 04, 2020 AMIT KUMAR ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present:
Mr. Shadab Ahmad, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Harkesh Kumar, AAG, Haryana.
***** SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Mr. G.S. Cheema, Advocate for Mr. Himanshu Raj, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 by filing his vakalatnama and submits that the result of the petitioner has been revised and he has passed. Thus, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner shall have liberty to get the same revived, in case, some grievance survives.
March 04, 2020 (SUDHIR MITTAL) Ankur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No