Satya Wati v. Manmohan Katyal & ORS

CR-591-2015 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-591-2015 (O&M).

Decided on: March 9, 2015.

Satya Wati ..... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Manmohan Katyal and others ..... Respondent(s) * * *

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT Mr.B.S.Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL) Vide impugned order lower appellate Court has merely directed the trial Court to comply with the order dated 16.4.2013 to give an opportunity to the respondent to pay the cost and proceed further in accordance with law.

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that no opportunity was granted to petitioner No.1 by the appellate Court. I have seen the memo of parties in order Annexure P1 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Amritsar. The defendant petitioner was proceeded against ex parte by the trial Court as such no error has been committed by the lower appellate Court in dispensing with the service of the petitioner. No ground is made out for interference in the impugned order which intends to give a fair opportunity to the parties to get adjudication of the matter on merits.

RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2015.03.11 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CR-591-2015 (O&M) Dismissed.

(M.M.S. BEDI) March 9, 2015.

JUDGE rka