Mohan Lal v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3062-2019 Date of Decision: 31.07.2024 Mohan Lal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present

None for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Amarjit Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. Jasjeet Beniwal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

***** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Seeking quashing of the order dated 05.12.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.

2.

On the last date of hearing, petitioner was absent and Coordinate Bench of this Court had vacated the interim order having regard to conduct of the petitioner. Today again, petitioner is unrepresented.

3.

Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that a compromise has been effected between the parties but petitioner's absence on two consecutive dates prima facie does not validate the compromise.

4.

Given above, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 31.07.2024 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/no Whether reportable?

Yes/no ANJU RANI 2024.08.01 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh