Naranjan Singh v. Gurdev Singh And ORS.

CR No.6071 of 2016 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6071 of 2016 Date of decision:30.11.2016 Naranjan Singh ... Petitioner Vs.

Gurdev Singh and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr. Karan Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that the objections raised qua execution and proving of report of Tehsildar (Ex.PW5/A), shall be treated as withdrawn. In view of such statement, I am of the view that the grievance of the petitioner-plaintiff to produce the report through the testimony of Tehsildar by way of additional evidence is rendered infructuous. At this stage, Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate submits that he wants to tender a copy of the mutation.

Liberty is granted to tender the copy of the mutation, in accordance with law. However, there shall be no order with regard to reSavita 2016.12.05 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CR No.6071 of 2016 {2} examination of Darshan Singh.

Accordingly, the revision petition stands disposed of in the aforementioned terms.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE November 30, 2016 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2016.12.05 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh