Parmila v. Sarjeet And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5831 of 2014 Date of Decision.10.04.2015 Smt. Parmila .......Petitioner

Versus

Sarjeet and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Himanshu Puri, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the revision petition has become infructuous and seeks for disposal as such. 2.

The revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 10, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.04.21 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document