← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/4832/2021dismissed

Munish @Minu v. State Of Haryana

2021-08-23Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRM No.25584 of 2021 in/and CRM-M No.4832 of 2021 ...1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.103 CRM No.25584 of 2021 in/and CRM-M No.4832 of 2021 Date of Decision: 23rd August, 2021.

Munish @ Minu

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) CRM No.25584 of 2021 This application has been moved for seeking the pre-ponement of the date of hearing in the main petition, i.e CRM-M No.4832 of 2021 from 15.10.2021 to some earlier date.

Notice in the application.

Mr. Apoorv Garg, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings in pursuance of the copy of this application having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice and submits that he has no objection in allowing this application. Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate, who has been contacted through the call on the mobile phone number of the Law Researcher attached to this Court, also conveys that he has no objection in allowing this application. Keeping in view the above-said facts as well as the reasons as SEEMA SHARMA 2021.08.23 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM No.25584 of 2021 in/and CRM-M No.4832 of 2021 ...2..

mentioned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the abovementioned main petition is taken on the Board today itself. CRM-M No.4832 of 2021 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one with better and correct particulars.

Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant have no objection for the same.

Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn with the liberty afore-said.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 23.08.2021.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2021.08.23 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh