High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/3931/2023dismissed

Gurmukh Singh @ Mokhi v. State Of Punjab

2023-01-25Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3931-2023 Date of Decision: 25.01.2023 Gurmukh Singh @ Mokhi ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ........ Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present

Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the grounds that only Kulhadi (Axe) was attributed to him and only one injury has been caused by him. Given the criminal history mentioned in para 7, there are 8 more cases pending against the petitioner.

Given above, nature of allegations which are serious and antecedents of petitioner which reflects that petitioner is involved in eight cases of similar nature offences, he is not entitled to anticipatory bail and the present petition is dismissed. It is clarified that this Court is declining bail to the petitioner mainly because of the criminal antecedents and it shall have no bearing regarding the bail filed by the other accused.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 25.01.2023 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2023.01.30 09:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.