Nirmala v. Satya Devi And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.5745 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.09.2019 Nirmala .......Petitioner versus Satya Devi and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Samrit Gill, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate, for the respondents. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondents-landlord submits that instant revision has rendered infructuous in view of delivery of possession of the demised property by the petitioner satisfying the decree in favour of respondents-landlord.

Learned counsel for the petitioner did not refute above submissions.

In view of above, revision is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(Ramendra Jain) Judge September 19, 2019 R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.09.26 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document