Manoj Kumar v. Union Territory Chandigarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-4849 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 10, 2021 Manoj Kumar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Union Territory, Chandigarh

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Vivek Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ashu Mohan Punchhi, Public Prosecutor with Mr.Anupam Bansal, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondent-U.T. Chandigarh.

Mr.Raman Sihag, Advocate for the complainant. **** ARCHANA PURI, J.

The matter has been taken up through video conferencing in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Photocopy of the report under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C as well as photocopy of residue statement of the prosecutrix, recorded yesterday, has been placed on record.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to pursue with the present petition, which may be dismissed as withdrawn.

Ordered accordingly.

(ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE March 10, 2021 Vgulati Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2021.03.10 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh