Shivam Sharma v. State Of Haryana
!"!#!$!!
!!# !
#%&' (')*+*,
!-".
/ !0! !
!
" !0! !2 !. # $
%
&
'()* * &%& + , - (.
/0 1) /1//
(.', *
02 , $
4
3
'/15#/16, * &
4
&
*% * /
&
%
%
% %
&
%&% *
1) 1# /1/' *08#0# /1/( %
!
"#$%! &
'( ) )
) #*) + ' '
% ,
#- #. # '
% ,
' / '
' $0 ) &
"1*.2
* 32& +
)
(
(
) )$04
' ' ' 552 )$0,
##"## *### 1
( '
" ' )
' ' )
'
)
5 #. # #"# 6
' '
& + ) &
+ 8 +
) ) '
+ )) +
)
) + ) & 1#32 ' 1#32
&
)
)
& +
& ) #2
) #2 )
"# 5
)
#. # ' '
' "1*.2 +
)
'
) ) ) ' ) '
' )
)
&&
) ) *
&
&
:& &
)
) )
;
)
&
+
&
) ) ;
' ) ) ' ' '
' & &
) ) '
/
'
)
;
) - '
&
/ ' + )
)
&
&
)
&
)
) 1
'
) )
' +
' /
'
&
'
' '
&
' ) < "
4 ) +
%
)6 '
4 $
) )&
3)
)
& '
)
' & * $
' )
'
)&
( ( ' )
) +
- !' '
4
' &
) && !
&')+ '&
)
8
2 )
% 4 2= )6
; &
9: =
9: !
&
(
)
)
'
+
.0 )
(
< ( *
has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the custody certificate, the petitioner has been in custody for 3 months and 25 days and has clean antecedents. Learned State counsel does not dispute that the petitioner has been nominated by aforementioned Krishan Kant Runthla. However submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature and the bank account of Krishan Kant Runthla was being managed by the present petitioner and the present petitioner is also said to have received amounts from Krishan Kant Runthla. 8 , &
&
0 9
&&
$
%
%& %&5
%
7 $&* 5!
2 -
&
% &&
%
% !0! !
#
$
; 9
5 :
9
%& -