Balram Singh v. State Of Punjab

 IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH
*+*, - .

  341 +$+$* *+*,

   $$$  0 11       $$$153 


(

"# $ %&'(
#  (

' Mr. /
0+
 

* 
1-


23
('

% %14
5(

' ) %$


6

*

(

()

*

 



 )
/3
3
 
!

 

 


 



"
71 8
 :;
*
()

 


 













   



#2
/
9,

,9

,

 

!

!
!


!"

#



$
%
& 
'()
 
*

(

 
*+
(

6
*
*

( 

()

*


 


(

()

 


*

( (
)
+* *


+
 
6
*
'

(

'
 )
**
(

 


$'-

( 
+
 







'

(
'


 ((
'
'


+

!, ,!

( )

*


** 
(




'
 -


-
' 
)
.'

()






* *
 
(


*+
*
'
'

* *
*
*(





$

)

5



* 
$





+*


(

( 

   


% *)
1-
4
5( (


 
*
()
(+

 


+)


+* 



*

)
(
 

*+
( 


'
 
')
+

*
 

#



 

*

(

(
+ "

#
-



 

*

(
 

-
 



+
* 



=
-

( 




 
()

 


*



-
*



* 
()

 


+




*

 




*

 



+

*+ ( 
#
+



* 


+*

 

"

"

+
+
 


(

(

'

'


 
*

 + :

1



+ 
*



'
 

*

< <+

*
()

 




-
 


,9

!


 ((
' 



*
'

'
-
( (3
-








 

*+ 

+


1
(
*



 '


 


(
 

*(

*+ 


 

**


 

*

( 


 '
 
+



' 


*-)

 
(
8 
*
(
 
'
'

-

 
*-


 ;


2 




(
* 
*
Rohi it Kumar Vs. State of Delhi : 20 008 Crl. J. 2561.
> 1
*



- 



*+
'



!

,:

"

?

?


'
3
* *

,:

"

"

*+
'
- -
8
$'-

+) )
*

!,
)


 *


'
5 


"

"

=

*


+ 


-
*



-
 

*+
'
8 
)

,

"
 

*
 


**
(
 



,:

"
' 
+
 

*
'

 
+)
*

!,
) )



**
(


 

$

+
' 


- 


*-

 
 ;



*
' 

*
 +




!,
)



(
-


 
+

 

*(

*+ 
'

+)

  2
 



(
*
* 
Gurappa Gugal and others Vs.

State of M Mysore : 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryn na :

2020(2) R RCR (Criminal) 339.
 , while adjourning the case e to 15.02.2024 4 to complete the mandatory p period of 30 days, the learned trial Court faile ed to consider the fact that 
 

-
8

+ 
()
+*)
 5





*+
'

 
(
*(


*
('
 

*(

*+ 


* *
*


'
 

!,
)
2



 8
 
(
+

  

  

 !"#$% %&  



*


 +


-
*
 
-
 

*+
'

 
-

+
*
* 


'
 
-

'

* 
'
**

(

1
*
 

7 ;



*( 

*+


(

*()
 

+
*
*


'

-

' 


 )
@


 +


(
8

 +
* 
*




+ 

'


 )



+
*
*

 
'

-

 

*)

 
*+


(
8 

+
*
*
 


  
6

( 
7; 7;

;



7 ;7;




5 -


5-
' 
+


'
(

- -
*( 


*+

 


+

*( 

*-
2 




(
* 
*
Pawan Kumar Gupta a Vs.

of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368.
The State 1)

-'


 

+
(-

 

-'

 


'


'

(-



* 
*

'


+*
 


"
718
  :;
*
()




 







  


 

 

#2
/
9,

,9

,



!

!
!


!"

#



$ 
%
& 
'()

* 

(


* ( 


'

 
*

+ +

,

0*

-'


 

*

)

5 



* 
'
'
(-) )
*

*)


 


 


(

 


'

*
 
,"
'3
+ +
)





 




+ +

(
(5 




* .)
(


 

6

**


*
(








+
)

#

+





*


**
( 

 


'

* 
+

*

(
+ 
(
+ +

$'-



( (
(5

*)+

 















2 ,,,, ,. 

(
*
()

* 
'

%
&
- -
1)
& (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE +$+$*+*,


 Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No