Sheela Rani v. Deepak Jain And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6427 of 2011 Date of Decision.24.03.2015 Sheela Rani .......Petitioner

Versus

Deepak Jain and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. K.S. Boparai, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 4 and 7.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The counsel for the petitioner says that the interim order was passed in a suit and the suit itself appears to have been dismissed in default. There is no scope for adjudication on the correctness of the interim order passed in a suit that has been dismissed for nonprosecution. 2.

The revision petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to revive this revision petition as and when the suit is restored to file.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 24, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.03.27 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document