Arvinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRM-M-3352 of 2019 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3352 of 2019 DECIDED ON: 05.02.2019 ARVINDER SINGH ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 5.

Mr. Tarundeep S. Khaira, Advocate, for respondent No.6.

***** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) As per office report, respondent No.9 was served through his wife. However, no one has appeared on his behalf. Notice sent to respondent No.7 received back unserved as his address is incomplete, whereas notice sent to respondent No.8 also received back unserved with the report that he is out of station.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No.6 is taken on record. Be tagged at appropriate place.

Learned State counsel contends that instant petition is gross abuse of the process of law, inasmuch as, two similar petitions bearing SONIKA 2019.02.07 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-3352 of 2019 --2-- CRM-M-4811-2017 and CRM-M-36835-2017 filed by wife and daughter of the deceased respectively have already been dismissed as withdrawn. This petition is being filed by son of the deceased praying for almost similar reliefs, which were in the earlier petitions. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of instant petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

05.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SONIKA 2019.02.07 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh