Ajmer Singh And ORS v. Surinder Pal Kaur

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6075 of 2012 Date of Decision.31.03.2016 Ajmer Singh and others .......Petitioners Vs.

Surinder Pal Kaur ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) The revision petition is dismissed as infructuous, having regard to the fact that the suit in which the interim order has been passed appears to have been dismissed for default. It will be open to the petitioners to seek for revival of this petition if the suit is also restored to file.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 31, 2016 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.04.01 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document