Neena Jain v. Pawan Kumar Jain
YOGESH SHARMA 2020.02.10 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-6242-2016 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR-6242-2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.02.2020 Neena Jain ... Petitioner
Versus
Pawan Kumar Jain ... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present:
Mr. Mandeep K. Sajjan, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the revision petition, the main suit itself has been decided, therefore, he wishes to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to move an application under Section 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, afresh in accordance with law.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 10.02.2020 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No