← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/6111/2012disposed of

Dinesh Kumar & ANR v. Anjana Mittal & ORS

2015-03-022 pages

Civil Revision No. 6111 of 2012 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6111 of 2012 Date of Decision: 02.3.2015.

Dinesh Kumar and another ......Petitioners

Versus

Anjana Mittal and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Vikas Bahl, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Kundra, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

None for respondents No. 2 to 5.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 11.9.2012 (Annexure P-2) and 2.3.2010 (Annexure P-1).

Heard.

During the course of arguments, it has transpired that the parties have concluded their evidence before the Trial Court and now the case before the Trial Court, is ripe for arguments. It has also transpired that plaintiff has filed an application for amendment of the plaint and the said application was dismissed by the Trial Court. The said order passed by the Trial Court has been challenged by the plaintiff in this Court and passing of the final GURPREET SINGH 2015.03.10 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Civil Revision No. 6111 of 2012 -2order has been stayed by this Court.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 has submitted that even if the amendment sought by the plaintiff is allowed, then the plaintiff will not lead any further evidence in support of the said amendment.

Thus, it is evident that the parties have concluded their evidence before the Trial Court. In these circumstances, since the trial is at the fag end, no ground for interference by this Court, at this stage, is made out. Petitioners by way of this petition, have challenged the interim arrangement made by the Trial Court during the pendency of the suit. Any observations made by the Courts below while passing the impugned orders, shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(SABINA) JUDGE March 02, 2015 Gurpreet GURPREET SINGH 2015.03.10 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh