Bharat Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:034001 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1553-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.03.2024 Bharat Singh ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ ***

Present:

Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Upasna Dhawan, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. M. S. Rana, Advocate for proposed respondent No.6 and for the applicant in CM-4281-CWP-2024.

Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the intervenor.

*** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed for directing respondents No.2 to 4 to conduct the demarcation while acting on the representation dated 15.12.2021 (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner to respondent No.3 within a stipulated period preferably from one month from the date of direction issued by this Court. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Harish Sharma, Kanungo, Dhauj, Faridabad has submitted that the demarcation as prayed for in the present petition has already been carried out on 01.03.2024 and thus, the present petition is rendered infructuous. RITTU 2024.03.12 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-1553-2024 (O&M) -2- 2024:PHHC:034001 Let the copy of demarcation report be provided to all the affected parties.

In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous. The parties would be at liberty to pursue their alternative remedies in accordance with law in case they have any surviving grievance.

In view of the disposal of the main case, there is no need to pass any order on application filed for impleadment of applicant Darshan Singh as respondent No.6, so CM-4281-CWP-2024 stands disposed of. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE 11.03.2024 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RITTU 2024.03.12 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document