Rinku Nath v. Jermal Singh
--'#-./01
( ()*)+(,-,). / 0 ,) 1234#1!-5&-6&,-,
&&& 1 "## #
&&& #713 ! $%
&
$ 2%
3$ 2% $
0 % 44444 '& 5
$
(
-'
##"# #.
6 1 $
& $$ !" #
+
(, +
$
+ & % & %&$
' ( )
&
''
$$ & #*
+ + (, +
!#, & $
) (,
%
$
&$
(
,
+
$$
( + 2 % 2 + 7&
8 9( $ &
!" "! #$ %
% #*
+ ( &
% + ( &$
6% % %&
8
&$
$
(, $$ ( (
5 , &
$% $ 7&
$
(, % :
%
%&
'( ")*)* #+#* , % -##- -).
/-).
.
")*)* #, * , % !#-#- .
.
")*)*$0 #* , % #'##- 1
. ' .
")*)*0 * , % '##- 3.
)2
%
$
%
(
2
& $% % - / $ %
2 7&
% 2% #-#"# $
%&$
' ) $
, %&&
$ ( &
$ &+
&$ &$ &
$ +, & $,%&$
%&$
2
%
# ## ###; 5 $
%
$
(, (,
$$ (
$$ $$ 2 &$
( ##"#
$
(7 #* %&$
&
+ " ) Jamboo Bhandari vs. M. P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. And others : (2024) 1 SCC (Cri) 90 + (
8 9( $ & #*
+ ( &
% % +( 7
&$ % % +&
$ 2 $$ $$
5 $ $ + + 2 (
+ % :
%
%&
9 %
.
$ 1 + % & %
In the instant case, while imposing condition of deposit of 20% of compensation amount, the learned appellate Court is not shown to have given any opportunity to the petitioner to make submissions regarding the exceptional circumstances warranting requirement of waiver of depositing of 20% of compensation amount and is shown to have imposed the said condition without the same. Therefore, keeping in view the settled proposition of law to the effect that the appellate Court was firstly required to consider as to whether the instant case falls within the exceptions warranting grant of suspension of sentence without imposing condition of deposit of 20% of compensation amount/fine, the impugned order dated 30.05.
2023 cannot be stated to be sustainable to the extent to which the condition of deposit of 20% of the compensation amount was imposed. Accordingly, the same is set aside to that extent.
(- depositing 20% of the compensation amount in pursuance of judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jamboo Bhandari's case (supra). The petition stands disposed of.
6.
The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate Court on 08.10.2024, which is the next date fixed before the Court. -5&-6&,-,) . 0