Sunil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others
!"#$!%&'&"()**
) +,
* - --,,
!"
# .... --,,/* ,
"
$
# % & #%'( ) $ * + # !
"
) &!)', $ $, , $ ./ .0 1.21 32 .3 1.24 " " $ "20 1.20,
*
, * .781.25 , $
$, 9
2.1
"
- " "25 1.209 "
"
.2 .7 1..+ 11 .4 1.21 !
! & -
(7' ./ .0 1.21 32 .3 1.24
& -
(5'9 ,
" $ , )
(:
" " , ; "8 )
$
) " 20 1.209 "
, "25 1.20 ) , " $ )< (10.12(1.24 "
() "
" 13 2.
1.209
%;
$ $(
" ) , " $ )< (5/+2(1.12
* 3( ) .4 1.11& -
(21' $ " 2.
1.11 " )
" $ ,
;
$ $
% #%& ' # (!)) $ = $ "
- 1.24
" 25 1.20 % " 22 .0 1.21 1.20 & -
(7 (5'
,
$8; " )
, -
(5" $ , )
(:
" $ 20 1.20
"
25 1.20
"
%$ $ , %; " $ ,
" " $ , )
(:
20 1.20
> ?
(
#% & '
" "
,
"
Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Ashok Kumar Sonkar Vs. Union of India and others', 2007(4) SCC 54, held that a candidate not holding the requisite qualification on cutoff date will be ineligible and cannot be considered at all. Equity or sympathy will have no role to play in such cases. ; " ,
--,, ** <
8
$@ 8* <
, @ 8*