Veena Vohra v. State Of Haryhana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-16924-2002 Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 VEENA VOHRA

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the petitioner Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of decision of respondent to reduce family pension.

2.

On 22.10.2002, a Division Bench of this Court issued notice of motion and stayed operation of impugned order. 3.

A period of 23 years from the date of passing of interim order has passed away. The status of petitioner is not known. In these circumstances, this Court finds it appropriate to make order dated 22.10.2002 absolute.

4.

Disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application within a period of three months, if cause survives. 5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.09.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.04 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document