High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/6125/2017dismissed

Smt. Sumitro Devi v. Mukesh Kumar

2018-04-02Mrs. Justice Anita Chaudhry1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6125 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Order: 02.04.2018 Smt. Sumitro Devi ..Petitioner

Versus

Mukesh Kumar ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate, for the respondent.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral).

Counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the revision petition has been rendered infructuous as the main petition filed under Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 has been finally decided. He has pointed out that the present revision petition was filed by the wife against the order passed by the learned trial court allowing visitation rights to her.

In view of the aforesaid, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.

However, the petitioner is granted liberty to move an application for recall, if the facts are otherwise. April, 02, 2018 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Naresh Kumar 2018.04.16 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh