High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCR/6504/2016dismissed

Pritam Lal v. Surender Sharma @ Surender Singh And ANR

2016-09-28Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CR-6504-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.6504 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 28, 2016.

Pritam Lal ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

Surender Sharma alias Surender Singh and another ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with prayer that petitioner be allowed reasonable time for vacating and handing over the possession of the demised premises to the respondent No.1-landlord. In view of request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The revision petitioner is allowed period upto 27.03.2017 to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent No.1-landlord, if not already vacated, subject to the following terms:- (i) The petitioner-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto 30th September 2016 within two weeks.

(ii) He will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne Sachin Mehta 2016.09.29 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CR-6504-2016 -2profits of subsequent months upto 27.03.2017 on or before 7th day of each month.

(iii) He will file affidavit before the Executing Court within three weeks giving details of entire payment of rent/mesne profits and undertaking to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent No.1 on or before 27.03.2017. In case of default of any of the above terms, respondent No.1-landlord will be entitled to execute the order of ejectment forthwith. The order has been passed in the absence of respondent No.1-landlord to avoid unnecessary delay and expenses. A copy of this order be conveyed to respondent No.1. In the event of respondent No.1 having any objection, he may file application to that effect. On receipt of the application, the same be listed for hearing. ( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 28, 2016.

JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2016.09.29 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH