High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/999/2021dismissed

Rvk Foods And Entertainment Llp v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-03-15Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-999-2021 Decided on : 15.03.2023 RVK Foods and Entertainment LLP . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Pawan K Jhanda, AAG, Haryana.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) On 21.11.2022 and 24.01.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner by noticing the said conduct, following order was passed on 24.01.2023:

"Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 5, to provide protection to the premises of the petitioner known as He-Man Restaurant, Karnal and to the management and staff of the petitioner.

Perusal of the file reveals that vide order dated 03.02.2021 notice of motion was issued for 16.03.2021.

Thereafter on two consecutive dates i.e. 28.06.2021 and 09.08.2021, there was a request for an adjournment. On 25.10.2021 during the time of COVID-19 pandemic, matter was taken up through video conferencing but on that day due to poor network connection, petitioner could not be connected. Thereafter, vide order dated 09.11.2022, matter was ordered to be put up before some other Bench.

On previous date of hearing i.e. 21.11.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

As per office report, registry had informed counsel for the petitioner about the date fixed for today. Despite this, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Reply dated 13.03.2021 filed on behalf of learned State counsel is already on record.

In the interest of justice, adjourned to 15.03.2023. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is interested in pursuing with the petition, he may come present on the next date of hearing, failing which, petition would stand disposed of for nonprosecution." KAVITA NAIN 2023.03.16 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment

CRWP-999-2021 - 2 - Today again, there is no one present on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, present petition requires to be disposed of. Dismissed for want of prosecution.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE March 15, 2023 k.nain Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2023.03.16 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment