Sudesh Rani v. Subhash Chander Mehta
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6186 of 2017 Date of Decision: 13.09.2017 SUDESH RANI
...Petitioner
VERSUS
SUBHASH CHANDER MEHTA
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present :
Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.
*** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside order dated 04.08.2017 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Sirsa (P-1) vide which evidence of the defendant-petitioner was ordered to be closed. A bare perusal of zimini order shows that on 01.03.2017, two DW's were present and examined as D.W.2 and D.W.3 and thereafter, matter was adjourned for 14.03.2017 for remaining evidence of the defendant-petitioner. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned on 14.03.2017, 29.04.2017, 26.05.2017, 10.07.2017 and 31.07.2017. Then, the impugned order was passed whereby evidence of the petitioner was closed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he only wants to cross examine D.W.3, which would be necessary for just decision of the case. In view of the above factual position, the revision petition is allowed and order dated 04.08.2017 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Sirsa is set aside. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to give one effective opportunity to the petitioner to cross examine D.W.3, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5000/- to be paid in the District State Legal Service Authority, Sirsa. (RITU BAHRI) September 13, 2017 JUDGE G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Gaurav Arora 2017.09.18 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh