Amar Lal Babbar v. Kishan Sihag

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR No.6550 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.05.2024 Amar Lal Babbar .....Revisionist-Petitioner.

Versus

Kishan Sihag .....Respondent.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Naveen Jhajholia, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.

None for the respondent.

(As per order dated 13.12.2016, the respondent was served through his son but none appeared on his behalf) ***** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.(Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner inform the Court that the instant revision-petition has become infructuous as the Civil Suit, out of which it had arisen, has already been decided by the concerned trial Court vide judgment dated 02.12.2021 and they pray that this revisionpetition be disposed of accordingly. 2.

Resultantly, the revision-petition in hand is, hereby, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 17, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether Reportable:

No YAG DUTT 2024.05.17 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment