Rajni Duggal v. Deepak Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.222 TA-79-2025 Date of Decision:24.04.2025 RAJNI DUGGAL ...Applicant

Versus

DEEPAK BASSI .....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the applicant.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) Despite the case having been called twice, none has made appearance on behalf of the applicant.

However, as per office noting, notice could not be issued to the respondent, as process fee has not been filed. Seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue with the present transfer application.

Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. (ARCHANA PURI) 24.04.2025 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Anu 2025.04.25 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh