Seema v. Krishna Chaudhary And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6625 of 2016 Date of Decision.03.10.2016 Dr. Seema .......Petitioner Vs.

Dr. Krishna Chaudhary and another ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) The counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, realized that in suit for damages, court fee can always be paid at the time when the Court arrived at assessment of damages. At this stage, Mr. Sandeep Singal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the revision petition and to take up all the pleas in the written statement. The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn but with liberty as aforesaid.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 03, 2016 Pankaj* Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.10.07 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document