Satish Kumar v. Haryana State

  

 
 
 



 !"#$!%&'&"() * +*, ,-  &'./012 ***33!44( 5'*   !"#26( **!'3"($!(
 ) 7 8 *
  


  

   



   9*24
 



 )# ! #!

- ./

$. & ''.

$.

'.'

0 

23



$( &% ''( 

5 ##!(%!0($!2!% &"( !( !(%!

$.

, !#

  

, &&&67

# 5  # !#

  

, $ 9    $: & ''.

+ 4

 
#

45;



 !   5  

# 

  #

#   !

& $  

! 5 

<        

 4#

$( &% ''( 

 $.

! 

 

!! 

 

 =  

 &( ''( #

:

>

#  

!

 #

 #

 

   

   "

 

  

 

 *#    

5 
=$7 4 

;

?#

=:7

+ 4

 *


=$7

;

?#       8 &&  

5

"# -! 
#

45; 5
=:74

 

    #

 ( &&6' &&  

 5
#

45;

*  

 @#



- .$

$: & ''.

/&%6/:

+
4

$& & ''.

;



    , 

!



!  



!

Pawan Kumar Vs. The Delhi Administration, 1989 CriLJ 127
Smt. Javitri Devi Vs. State, 1971 CriLJ 1340

Manpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab CRM,M,30499,2014 

8 & $&%

9


 

!

State of H.P.

Vs. Tape Ram and another, 2012(7) R.C.R. (Criminal) 56. .

 

 # #

#!

#    

  





#

 5



 

#  

 # 

   

 

  /'

/'

 5 "Section 39. Previous sanction of the district magistrate necessary in certain cases.― 





 



 







 



-



   % +

  5

   ;



5  !

 # # 

 !

  

 # 5 #  # ### 

*#

2  #

Avtar Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 2023 SC 1588 !  

5 !



      



 


 

 

 



           Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and others  

(2019) 5 SCC 480. ( B #

  

 

  





5



   B   # "#  "#

 

   # !   

  = 

#  #

 

"#  5 ! 

  @#   5

C



 "#

 # "#



  #  <5   #

  # !# 5#

  

+ 5#

  "# *#  @#

- .$

$: & ''.

/&%6/:

+
4

$& & ''. 5  



'

+ 5

#  





5 #

# 

!



! 

5

#!

5

$( &% ''( 

 )# !    

@#

! 



&

 

#   03

  



 :  ;

/& &. $&$:

   

= ;

!6

D6- =  

D6-