← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/5057/2021allowed

Sonu Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana

2021-09-02Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRM-M No.5057 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.204 CRM-M No.5057 of 2021 Date of Decision: 02nd September, 2021.

Sonu Kumar & Another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. S.S.Pannu, DAG, Haryana.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) Both the petitioners herein named Sonu and Sahil Kumar seek the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.0011 dated 12.01.2021 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar District Yamuna Nagar, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 341 & 506 IPC. Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Parwinder Singh, Police Station City Jagadhri, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 16.02.2021 as passed by the Co-ordinate Bench, the petitioners have joined in the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required and they are also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

Keeping in view the above-said submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as SEEMA SHARMA 2021.09.02 04:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.5057 of 2021 ...2...

extended to both the above-named petitioners by the Co-ordinate Bench vide the said order dated 16.02.2021, is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 02.09.2021.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2021.09.02 04:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document